Most legal problems are easier to solve before they become problems. Using real cases, we look at why it works that way and what stops people from asking in time.
In the first episode of the Lawvia podcast, our founder Ramil Kunakbaev talked with Gevorg Ayrumyan, a licensed attorney in Slovakia. Gevorg has lived in Slovakia since 1993 and has spent years working with Slovak clients and Russian-speaking expats alike.
The main idea of that conversation sounds obvious, yet in practice people remember it too late:
it is better to talk to a lawyer before a problem becomes a problem.
“You have already signed it? Then what exactly should I look at?”
A typical call:
— Could you look at my lease agreement?
— Have you already signed it?
— Yes.
And here comes the awkward question: what can still be fixed? The terms are agreed, the signature is on the page. You can of course go back to the landlord, ask to amend a clause, negotiate. But the other side is now under no obligation to agree.
Another conversation:
— We are about to buy an apartment. We would like a lawyer to look at the documents first.
— Good that you called now. After the deal there would be far less room to change anything.
These two situations can be days apart. The difference in consequences is measured in thousands of euros. Before a document is signed, most questions can be handled calmly: discuss the terms, reword a clause, drop something unfavourable, or reconsider the deal altogether. After signing, everything becomes harder. And more expensive. Negotiation turns into a dispute, a mistake into a problem. Sometimes the only remaining way to change anything is court.
And almost every conversation about the consequences of a decision made without advice ends, sooner or later, with the same sentence:
“I didn't know I could have asked a lawyer beforehand.”
Why people don't ask in advance
Add up what you will pay over a year of rent, compare it with the price of a single legal consultation, and the logic seems obvious. Yet people calmly sign obligations worth thousands of euros while being unwilling to spend a few dozen or a hundred euros to understand what exactly they are signing. Why? There are at least three reasons.
Legal services look closed off and expensive
Many people simply don't know what a lawyer costs or what the price depends on. It is common to arrive in a new country with a firm belief that a lawyer is expensive by definition, and that a consultation inevitably ends with a large bill. In practice it is far more mundane: you are paying for a specialist's time and expertise. In Slovakia a consultation can cost about as much as a couple of dinners out. You can find out the price by asking one question, and it is often noticeably lower than expected.
The process itself looks complicated
You have to find a specialist, call someone, explain your situation to a stranger. In your head it becomes a separate project. Meanwhile you have half an hour, a contract on the table and a request to sign it today. So it feels easier to ask a friend or post the question in a Facebook group. The only trouble is that the reply comes not from your lawyer but from another person with their own experience, their own situation and their own circumstances.
It feels like the answer has already been found
Someone told a similar story. Someone in a group answered confidently. An acquaintance went through “exactly the same thing”.
Formally you have your information, and you feel you have worked it out. In reality you are holding someone else's answer to someone else's question, given at a different time and under different circumstances. And in legal matters, details have an unpleasant habit of changing everything.
Why advice from the internet doesn't solve the problem
Comments in community groups can be useful, if only because they make you realise there is a legal question here at all. But using that advice as a ready-made solution is risky. In the attorney's experience, a significant share of what gets written in those discussions turns out to be inaccurate, or applicable only to the case of the person who wrote it. Usually nobody is misleading anyone on purpose. People simply describe their own experience.
And two legal cases that look alike from the outside can end in completely opposite ways. The same circumstance works in your favour in one case and against you in another. The outcome of any case depends on the details. And those details are almost never in a short post by a stranger online.
Here is a real example.
A client calls in a panic: she applied for permanent residence (trvalý pobyt) for her child, and now, as she understood it, the child's temporary residence (prechodný pobyt) has been cancelled. She spends two days under serious stress.
The attorney asks her not to retell the letter but to send the document itself. It turns out there is no cancellation decision at all. It is a request (výzva) to complete the file, with a 15-day deadline. Hence a very simple rule:
Don't retell the document. Show the document.
And show it to someone who understands not only Slovak, but legal Slovak. Understanding a text and understanding a legal text are two different things — and that is true well beyond Slovakia.
What a consultation before the decision actually gives you
You can see your options
Reviewing the contract is the most visible part of legal work. It is often not the most valuable. What matters more is that you know your options in advance. What can be changed. What is worth insisting on. Where you can concede. What follows if you leave everything as it is. After that you walk into the negotiation with your eyes open.
Most contracts do look fairly standard. But standard wording does not mean the terms are equally good for both sides. Sometimes a contract simply protects the interests of one of them far better.
You stop guessing
Sometimes you understand the situation well enough. But the doubt remains: what if I am missing something? Getting a specialist's opinion on your own case is neither a luxury nor an attempt to hand off responsibility. It is a way to make a decision while understanding its consequences.
Life is complicated enough already. There is no need to add a problem that one conversation could have prevented.
You learn things that aren't in any instruction
A simple example from practice. When arranging certain documents, a state authority may ask for the original birth certificate. People hand over the original and only afterwards realise how important that document is for other procedures. Many never think of preparing a notarised copy in advance. Yet sometimes one question before submitting is enough to avoid trouble later.
Legal practice consists largely of details like this. They are rarely written down in instructions. But they are exactly what creates problems for people afterwards.
How to make asking in advance a habit
There is nothing complicated about it. Three simple rules are enough.
Ask for time to review
If the other side is serious about the deal, you should have time to read the documents. You can simply say:
“Please send me the contract in advance. I would like to read it properly before we meet.”
„Pošlite mi, prosím, zmluvu vopred. Chcel(a) by som si ju v pokoji prečítať ešte pred stretnutím.“
This does not come across as distrust. Quite the opposite, it shows that you take your obligations seriously. But if for some reason they are unwilling to give you time to read the document before signing, that in itself is a reason to be careful.
Don't rely on a retelling
When it comes to an official letter, a contract or a decision of a state authority, look at the document itself. Not a friend's summary. Not an interpretation from Facebook. Not the explanation of someone who “went through exactly this”. The document itself. And if the situation matters, show it to a specialist in full, ideally together with the background. An answer rarely exists separately from the question and from the situation as a whole.
Ask before you act
Before signing a contract. Before submitting documents. Before an important meeting. Before a visit to a state authority you have been summoned to. Before a deal.
These are the points where a consultation costs the least and can make the biggest difference. As long as the step has not been taken, you still have room to choose. Afterwards you are usually just repairing the consequences.
What if the moment has passed?
A decision of a state authority must state the deadline and the procedure for filing an appeal (odvolanie), or for using another remedy provided by law. So the first thing to look at is the decision itself and the deadlines set out in it.
While the relevant deadline is still open, options may remain. Which ones exactly depends on the decision, the grounds for it and the stage of the proceedings.
Once the deadline passes, the decision becomes final and there is almost nothing left to change. At best you start over, if a new application is even possible in your situation, and that means months again. Sometimes only court remains, and that means years.
So when an official letter arrives, look first not only at what it says, but at the dates and deadlines. The wording can sound alarming while describing a completely routine step. As in the case of the client who spent two days certain that her child's residence had been cancelled, when all that was needed was to complete the file.
If you have a specific situation
A contract you have not signed yet. A letter from a state authority with a deadline for a response or an appeal. A deal you are only planning. These are exactly the “before” points, where a matter can often be settled faster, more calmly and at lower cost.
A one-off consultation with an attorney costs €149. You describe your situation and send the documents. The attorney studies them in advance, and on the call goes through your situation and explains what to do next. After the consultation you receive a written summary with a list of the steps ahead.
Either way you leave the consultation with certainty: what is actually happening, what your options are and what the timing is.
The best moment for that conversation is while the document is still unsigned and the deadline in the letter has not started running.
Watch the episode: A lawyer for prevention, not treatment
If the video doesn't load, the full episode is on our YouTube channel:
watch the video.
The conversation is recorded in Russian, with English subtitles.
We record these conversations not to convince people to see a legal problem in every document. The point is the opposite: to understand your rights and possible risks in advance, before a situation calls for emergency measures.
Stay in touch
Subscribe to the channel so you don't miss new episodes, and to the Lawvia newsletter: we cover changes in legislation and publish practical material.
If you have a question, write to us at questions@lawvia.sk. We read every message and cover the most common topics in our next articles and episodes.
This material is for information purposes and is not legal advice. Every situation requires an individual assessment.
